Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:18 pm by Amy Howe
The new term is already full of interesting cases, including the very first one on Monday, October 7: Kahler v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am by Jane Bambauer
Jane BambauerFor the conference on Public Health in the Shadow of the First AmendmentThis is Part Two of a two-part post on the First Amendment issues raised in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am by Scott Bomboy
The proposed amendment repealed the 23rd Amendment and gave the federal District two United States Senators and a representative in the House. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am by David Kopel
In 1998, the Supreme Court issued its most important modern decision on the Excessive Fines Clause, United States v. [read post]
United Kingdom, known as the Irish State Case. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:50 am by Deborah Pearlstein
  Whittington emphasizes “two considerations that should weigh on the minds of the justices and that might give them pause before extending the logic of United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:58 am by Elina Saxena
” According to State Department sources, the number of militants fighting for the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria is at its lowest in two years. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Southerners from John Randolph to James Madison objected to the apparently broad definition of federal power in McCulloch and Gibbon v. [read post]