Search for: "Johnson v. State of California" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Jeff Gamso
Walker, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am by Kelly
Etymotic Research, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Location of manufacture and decision to mark weight heavily on venue analysis for false marking claims; action dismissed where another qui tam realtor had filed an earlier suit against defendant: San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:39 pm by Gideon
So recognized the Ninth Circuit in a recent decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm by cdw
State, 2010 OK CR 14 (OklaCrim App 7/1/2010) State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Johnson forAmici Curiae United Trustee’s Association and California Mortgage Association.Leland Chan for Amicus Curiae California Bankers Association.I. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:05 pm by Jon Sands
California has what is known as a Johnson waiver when it comes to state sentences. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
  No adequacy.In Re Northern District of California, Dalkon Shield IUD Products Liability Litigation, 693 F.2d 847 (9th Cir. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
His medical training included a year as Chief Resident and a Fellowship in the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Humanitarian Law Project seems to reject this: United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Johnson: “If the [Government’s] regulation is not related to expression, then the less stringent standard we announced in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 47715, May 14, 2010) questioned the finding of no irreparable harm and ordered defendants to respond before deciding the issue.In Johnson v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Among the cases the Court refused on Monday to hear were a test of the constitutional power of states to make state tax laws retroactive and in the process to wipe out pending refund claims under an invalid law (Johnson Controls, et al., v. [read post]