Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 1241 - 1260 of 6,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2023, 11:41 am
Tsai, Boston University School of Law, and Mary Ziegler, University of California, Davis, School of Law, are publishing Abortion Politics and the Rise of Movement Jurists in volume 57 of the UC Davis Law Review. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 11:41 am by Christine Corcos
Tsai, Boston University School of Law, and Mary Ziegler, University of California, Davis, School of Law, are publishing Abortion Politics and the Rise of Movement Jurists in volume 57 of the UC Davis Law Review. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Boston University School of Law, and Mary Ziegler, University of California, Davis School of Law, have posted Abortion Politics and the Rise of Movement Jurists, which is forthcoming in the UC Davis Law Review:This article employs the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:52 pm
Copies of the opinions can be purchased from the Law Weekly for a nominal price by calling 1-800-276-7427 and providing the noted PICS Case Numbers.In the case of Davis v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Davis obtained an order in the Family Court of the Navajo Nation validating her Navajo common law adoption by Mr. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:51 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
The plaintiffs are represented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Davis, Wright Tremaine LLP, Walters Law Group, and Daphne Keller. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:34 am by Hull & Hull LLP
  Sharon Davis:   And certainly that was the case in the Fiaco v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:38 am by Broc Romanek
Antitrust Laws As noted in this Davis Polk memo, the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Cari Rincker
  The original precedent set in the Tennessee case of Davis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm by Lawrence Solum
Justice Scalia’s rigid, formalistic approach to testimonial statements in Davis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Whether the Budin defendants would have prevailed on such motion will have to be determined by the trier of fact (see Davis v Isaacson, Robustelli, Fox, Fine, Greco & Fogelgaren, 284 AD2d 104 [1st Dept 2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 613 [2002]; F.P. v Herstic, 263 AD2d 393 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]