Search for: "LITTLE v. TERRITORY" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2010, 1:33 pm
Thus, the agreement was not a franchise as a matter of law.Therefore, the dealer was denied partial summary judgment on its "little FTC Act" counterclaim. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:46 am by Eric
Copyright owners try to engage in price discrimination by carving up the world into geographic territories with different prices for the same product. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
This week the European Court of Human Rights handed down a landmark judgment on human trafficking in the case of Rantsev v Cyprus & Russia. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:17 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Is there a danger in antagonizing ‘the West v. the Rest’ when urgent measures are required to address environmental crises? [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 4:39 am
[iv]Municipally supplied drinking water contains very little lead. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm by Stephen Page
Section 90UE provides for thecontinued operation of writtenagreements made by de facto couples under the defacto financial law of anon-referring State covering property settlement or spousemaintenancematters if the couples later satisfy a geographical connection withareferring state or territory.2.46 Item 16 replaces the existingsubsection 90UM(5) with a provision to allowthe court to set aside a PartVIIIAB financial agreement covered by section 90UE ifthe agreement was notmade in… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:54 pm
One such decision is Skype Technologies SA v Joltid Ltd and others [2009] EWHC 2783 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) ruling of Mr Justice Lewison on 6 November, which takes a little thinking about. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:01 pm
In a case now pending before the Supreme Court (Holder v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:55 am by Stephen Pitel
Spoiler alert - the answer is Norfolk Island, an external territory of Australia located in the south Pacific Ocean. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 3:06 pm
The Nuremberg International Military Tribunal addressed the issue of pre-emptive strikes in United States v. [read post]