Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 6,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
Without an honest assessment of the federal-tribal regulatory relationship and the potential impacts of federal policies on tribal decision-making, the United States risks continuing the legacy of federal, not tribal, perspectives governing tribal lands. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
In Montana v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:32 am
As a contribution to the Issue on the fiftieth anniversary of United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:26 am
All suits and actions arising under this Agreement shall be brought in the Commonwealth of Virginia, USA and License hereby submits to the jurisdiction of the Courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the United States District Courts Sitting in Virginia. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 4:14 pm
V, § 2. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Under the (perhaps largely defunct) “Lemon test” from Lemon v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
In a 2-1 decision in Apache Stronghold v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
Would you believe that dry land can be categorized as "waters of the United States," and thus subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act? [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 11:17 am
See also United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34… [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
The United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is but one example. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:12 am
§ 1447(d) generally provides that “an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal,” the United States Supreme Court explained in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:12 am
§ 1447(d) generally provides that “an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal,” the United States Supreme Court explained in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:21 am
United States, 308 F.3d 1283, 1288 (Fed. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:21 am
United States, 308 F.3d 1283, 1288 (Fed. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 9:23 am
Morales-Vázquez, No. 19-1503, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (January 19, 2021), Judge Bruce M. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 10:32 am
In cases like United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:47 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
Because the modern state is very complicated, there is nevertheless no precise definition of the scope of that foundation. [read post]
