Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm
Lord Neuberger MR recently gave a speech to the RICS conference on dilapidations. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
The House of Lords in SAAMCo v York Montague set out the principle that a wrongdoer is unlikely to be liable for all the consequences of their actions unless justified by special policy. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 1:00 am
Before Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson, judgment was handed down in the case of the Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water Plc, [2014] UKSC 40 on 2nd July 2014. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
The key conclusion which the Judge comes to is that the state of the law on this issue is currently ‘uncertain and in flux’, and so ‘probably requires the attention of an appellate court’ ([107]). [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:22 am
The then Lord Justice Neuberger was one the Court of Appeal judges in the seminal 2005 privacy decision in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am
The Secretary of State for Justice during the Second Reading of the Bill described concerns about “annoyance” as a “canard” (see further below). [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, and Lord Toulson. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Wilson and Lord Sumption. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:00 am
Despite Ms Berrisford’s success on the first point, Lord Neuberger went on to consider her alternative case in contract (the licence argument pursued before the Court of Appeal) and stated he “incline[d] fairly strongly to the view” that such an argument would have been successful insofar as it applied to the original contracting parties. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Abrams v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:29 pm
Jurors must be trusted to faithfully adhere to their duties (R v B). [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:42 am
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, with Lord Justice Floyd setting out the reasons with which Lord Justices Flaux and Patten agreed. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:12 pm
The court considered the application of the principle of ‘purposive construction’, derived originally from the words of Lord Diplock in the UK case of Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:19 pm
Marley v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:53 am
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
Lord Hodge, with whom Lord Carnwath agreed, provided a dissenting judgment and specifically addressed the issue of retrospective assessment, citing the general principle stated in W T Ramsey Ltd v Inland Revenue Comrs [1981] UKHL 1 that, despite the fact that legislation to counter tax avoidance as a matter of sound policy may involve provisions with retroactive effect, this does not negate the need for clear and positive words as to the retrospective effect of… [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 9:31 am
Oday Yabari, R (on the application of) v The Lord Mayor and Citizens of the City of Westminster (2023) EWHC 185 (Admin) A judicial review of what was alleged to be Westminster’s failure to meet its s.188(1) duty to secure suitable accommodation and breach of Public Sector Equality Duty. [read post]
