Search for: "Lyles v. State"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:33 am
That is particularly likely in the case of the state government plaintiffs, since the Court recently adopted extremely permissive standing requirements for state plaintiffs in Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
The following contribution to our Kiobel v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:21 am
United States, and Filarsky v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
In FAA v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am
And Lyle Denniston of this blog, Jennie Ryan at JURIST, and Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal all provide coverage of Louisiana v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:17 am
The parties in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
These grants are in addition to Friday’s orders (which Lyle covered last week), in which the Court agreed to review the constitutionality of three redistricting plans drawn up by a federal court for the Texas legislature and the state’s delegation to the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm
But if you want to multitask by getting some background on the substantive arguments before the Court while you listen, you could try the 2013 oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 6:59 am
In Gill v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:00 am
Stephen Vaughan’s article discusses the Fifth Circuit’s Fisher v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 7:30 pm
In 1997, in State Oil v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:28 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 3:59 am
Coverage of yesterday’s ruling in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:11 am
For example, let’s start off with Milner v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:11 am
Perry (the challenge to Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:24 am
United States and Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:09 am
The appellate judge suggested that perhaps the issue could be posed to the California Supreme Court for a determination as to whether California law would allow any entity to stand in as a legal “proxy” for the suit.Perry’s well-heeled lawyers stated in response to the suggestion that even if California law allowed a proxy-style legal fight, the proxy would be unable to demonstrate how they were harmed by lifting the ban against same-sex marriage.Scholars of the… [read post]
