Search for: "MAJORS v. MAJORS"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 62,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
Over at the website of the UC Davis Law Review, you can find Gerald Leonard’s Fletcher v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:26 am
Writing for a 6-3 majority, Justice Sam (I am Green Eggs and Ham) Alito reversed the holding in Marbury v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 6:41 pm
A lot’s been written about the High Court’s recent decision in Baze v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
The Court's decision in FEF v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm
Besides Alito’s plurality decision in McDonald v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:40 pm
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit delivered its en banc opinion on inequitable conduct last week in Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm
The case of Yanisse Adrian v Mesirow Structured Settlements, LLC was heard by US District Court Judge Francisco Besosa and he granted the defendants summary judgement motion and dismissed the case. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 8:05 pm
There were no major revolutions this term. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:05 pm
There were no major revolutions this term. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Harris et al. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:40 am
On appeal from: 2013 EWCA Crim 1104 The Supreme Court, by a majority of 3:2, allowed the appeal concerning whether VAT, paid or accounted for to HMRC, should be discounted when calculating the benefit figure to be confiscated under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:20 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument today in Washington v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 12:30 pm
Red Hail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978), which is to appear in The Poverty Law Canon: Exploring the Major Cases, ed. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:34 pm
Earlier today, the Eighth Circuit ruled against Major League Baseball in the high-profile fantasy baseball case of CBC Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:45 am
Jones v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
That’s not required as a constitutional matter under the Free Exercise Clause; the Court decided that in Employment Division v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:27 pm
I was interested to note, while reading all three of the major Internet porn cases - ACLU v. [read post]
"Haymond seemingly to become major Apprendi progeny altering federal supervised release revocations"
27 Feb 2019, 2:50 pm
Doug Berman has this post at Sentencing Law & Policy, focusing on the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:43 pm
Yesterday, the Missouri Supreme Court in Watts v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:29 am
Giving the majority judgment Lord Clarke stated that S & Marper was concerned only with the position of suspected but non-convicted persons, not convicted persons. [read post]
