Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 20,066
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Protecting Privacy and Privilege Rights in Non-Party Requests for Documents
15 Jun 2023, 12:01 pm
FRCP 1.280(b) provides as follows: (b) Scope of Discovery. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am
(b) Anti-commandeering. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:55 pm
Texas Code and Criminal Procedure §49.25, Subsection B. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:02 am
The Council is responsible for reviewing ALJ decisions on Medicare payment and coverage matters. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
The Wagstaffe Group also authors T he Wagstaffe Practice Guide: Federal Civil Procedure Before Trial . [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:52 am
" Turning to the Restatement (Second) of Agency, the Board looked at:[T]he following matters of fact, among others, are considered: (a) the extent of control which, by the agreement, the master may exercise over the details of the work; (b) whether or not the one employed is engaged in a distinct occupation or business; (c) the kind of occupation, with reference to whether, in the locality, the work is usually done under the direction of the employer or… [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
" Another post stated that "your husband couldn't stand you why should we? [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Michener, and T. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 11:50 am
This shouldn’t be a surprise. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 9:26 am
The City’s Historic Preservation Committee then voted that the bronze statue wasn’t Landmark No. 3 and isn’t eligible for historic landmark status. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
When I didn't congratulate the prevailing lawyers, that was generally because (a) I thought the decision as a whole (and not just the part I wrote about) was split enough to not be a victory, (b) the lawyers' names weren't easily obtainable, (c) there were so many lawyers on the winning side that listing them all would have been a chore, or (d) I forgot. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:59 pm
The Chinese Judgment recorded that: ‘[t]he defendant [Yin] failed to attend despite having been legally summoned to attend. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 8:14 am
” 750 ILCS 5/401(b) But such an objection does not really dismiss the divorce case. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 7:00 pm
")The quote, "las ideas no se matan" means "literally"-- ideas can't be killed-but it also carries some overtones-it can be a form of indirect command (don't kill ideas)-or it serves as a reference to the basic set of normative and universal truths which are beyond human power to alter, or to the actual person who holds these ideas and seeks to spread them. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 11:35 am
. dangerously encourages government to think it can use private firms to circumvent the First Amendment—as long as it doesn't turn them into government actors. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 8:04 am
The original or a duplicate of a record of regularly conducted activity that would be admissible under Rule 803(6) if accompanied by a written certification of its custodian or other qualified person that the record (A) was made at or near the time of the occurrence of the matters set forth by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge of these matters; (B) was kept in the course of the regularly conducted activity; and (C) was made by the regularly… [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
“See as president I could have declassified it….Now I can’t, you know, but this is still a secret. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:36 am
The first potentially relevant model was originally published by Eric B. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:36 am
The first potentially relevant model was originally published by Eric B. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:59 am
”[4] The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Seventh Circuit’s interpretation of the FCA, emphasizing that “[w]hat matters for an FCA case is whether the defendant knew the claim was false,” because “[t]he FCA’s scienter element refers to respondents’ knowledge and subjective beliefs—not to what an objectively reasonable person may have known or believed. [read post]
