Search for: "MATTER OF K A B" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
If it is not and the statute provides the defendant with adequate notice and the police with clear criteria, that is the end of the matter. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 7:00 pm by Paul J. Feldman
I recently posted an item summarizing the broad strokes of the FCC’s new “Open Internet” (a/k/a net neutrality) rules and policies. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 7:21 am
 The Rapporteur and the Technical Judge were quite strict on the question of how the claim features could be discerned, surmised, or assumed, from the website information and interrogated Mr Casalonga on the matter. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 7:01 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
No matter how each state imposes tax, when it comes to federal income tax, the rules are the same: you can only deduct taxes you paid on personal property that you own, when tax is imposed on the value of the item on an annual basis. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:39 pm by Michelle Ball, Attorney for Students
 If one of these cannot be proven, even if the underlying offense can be, the student cannot be expelled (in the non-mandatory expulsion categories).Arguments on these matters should be made at the hearing, and likely will need to be made on appeal to the local County Board of Education if the school expulsion panel/board do not seem to understand the arguments or fail in their proof. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 3:05 am by Broc Romanek
More on “MD&A Omissions Can Be Actionable in Section 10(b) Claims” A few months ago, I blogged about a split between the 9th Circuit and 2nd Circuit on whether an alleged failure to make a disclosure required by Item 303 of Regulation S-K is an actionable omission under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The threshold for issuing a form W-2 is based on dollars – nothing else matters. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:05 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
You may still have to pay the 10% additional tax even if you didn’t have much of a say in the matter. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
As a matter of doctrine, the NFIB decision is not on point. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:57 am by David DePaolo
Loss of reputation sustained in the past; k. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:46 pm
” Hence, Wesley’s complaint stated a claim for false arrest under Rule 12(b)(6) as long as he alleged facts allowing the fact-finder to infer some “apparent reason to question [J.S.] [read post]