Search for: "MATTER OF T F T M M F B M"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2011, 7:27 am
Rev. 2417 (1997).)(5) The law can’t be justified under “strict scrutiny” as being narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest in “aid[ing] parental authority” by “ensure[ing] that parents can decide what games are appropriate,” because(a) the industry’s voluntary self-regulation already “does much to ensure that minors cannot purchase seriously violent games on their own, and that parents who care about the matter can… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:29 am
But as I'm told, old lawyers just don't get it, and we're threatened by baby lawyers who turn themselves into overnight sensations on the internet. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am
Since we’re in Umbria, I really shouldn’t be writing anything at all, but I’m up with the chickens (literally) and the rest of the family isn’t. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm
They should be responsible for the strategy, but also help with practical matters, such as Visa, travel, and coping with the local bureaucracy. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm
They should be responsible for the strategy, but also help with practical matters, such as Visa, travel, and coping with the local bureaucracy. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
L: Jesus, what the f**k is it with you and shirts? [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am
As regards selection of a secondary reference, T 176/84 MÖBIUS/Pencil sharpener is a widely followed appeal board decision. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:51 am
D’Andrea, 497 F. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
In fact, Roshco did not receive t h e March 2000 Contract which It0 alleges altered the Chesterfield price f r o m $9.5 million to $8.6 million. [read post]
30 May 2011, 10:27 am
’” I’m not sure that “good faith” should extend to require the defendant to act above reproach with respect to non-trademark matters, but it doesn’t matter here. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
Lankford, 684 F. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
Her hapless colleague in the Northern District of California, Judge Ronald M. [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:07 am
’” Griffin No. 2 (quoting Philip M. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
I-B. [read post]
16 May 2011, 2:27 pm
F. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:17 pm
Open this year, but now I’m saving my nickels so I can fly in to New York or Boston and sit in the back of the courtroom for one or two of these judicial bank bar-b-ques. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am
Note: I’m generally sympathetic to First Amendment arguments in trademark, but I can’t help thinking that in America today it pays to be a big company facing a smaller foe. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:59 am
I’m not imagining things, am I? [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:43 am
Code § 1030(c)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:03 am
[I'm sure Apple is viewing this with interest, in light of the ongoing commotion over its location tracking. [read post]
