Search for: "Majors v. Smith"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 3,035
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
Smith v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
Smith v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
Arthrex on Remand: Commissioner of Patents Drew Hirshfeld and the Problem of Shadow Acting Officials
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm
(My colleague Rebecca Eisenberg and I have criticized United States v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 10:44 am
Corp. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The court’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
Child support -- Modification -- Administrative support order -- Trial court fundamentally erred when it reduced father's monthly child support obligations without notice or hearingDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Loretta Sermon, Cherral Smith, and Yata Frichelle Canty, Appellant, v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 11:44 am
Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
The supporting Reporters’ Note to §4(b) confirms:The overwhelming majority of jurisdictions hold that compliance with product safety regulation is relevant and admissible on the question of defectiveness, but is not necessarily controlling.Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §4, reporter’s notes to comment e (1998). [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:39 pm
NSA and Smith v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:56 am
Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), this Court held that, under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause, the "vast majority" of its precedents apply low-level scrutiny to neutral, generally applicable laws imposing a substantial burden on the free exercise of religious conduct. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 5:02 am
See Major Matthew Gilligan, Opening the Gate? [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
In Smith v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am
” At Ikuta Matata, Sean Smith wonders whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop might influence a similar case pending in the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
The crux of the dispute—between Chief Judge Kozinski and the dissenting Judge Smith—is whether Cindy Garcia has a copyright interest in her performance. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
Court of Appeal decided that lawyers’ financial records are not presumptively subject to solicitor-client privilege.Writing for the 2-1 majority in Donell v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
Smith, 08-1351). * A First Amendment test of the firing of a public employee merely because he or she announced a candidacy for elected office, where laws allow such a candidacy. [read post]
12 May 2025, 2:03 am
On Tuesday and Wednesday 6 and 7 May 2025 Nicklin J heard a case management conference in the case of Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon v Associated Newspapers KB-2022-003316 and the associated cases of Hurley v Associated Newspapers, Sir Elton John and David Furnish v Associated Newspapers, Sir Simon Hughes v Associated Newspapers, Sadie Frost Law v Associated Newspapers and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex v… [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am
Indeed, the Hewitt en banc majority had a heterodox makeup: Ho, Smith, Stewart, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson. [read post]
