Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 70,923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 6:59 am
The trial in the BP Oil Spill case began yesterday in New Orleans federal court, before U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:26 am
Kat friend Tyrone Berger reports on a recent case in Australia that addresses the ever-vexing quetion of when use amounts to trade mark use.In the recent decision of Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Ltd, the Australian Federal Court has found that the name given to a style of bikini will not amount to 'use as a trademark' so as to consitute trade mark use. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 1:53 am
Ancient Caishen, cartoon Caishen, and... miaow💰Last month, an interesting case related to Caishen was heard by the Beijing IP Court: can Caishen be registered as a trade mark? [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
But the dispute with Coca Cola is not the only trade mark case in which Pom Wonderful is seeking to assert its trade mark rights. [read post]
18 May 2017, 2:01 pm
The Law Library has just received the latest book by University at Buffalo School of Law Professor Mark Bartholomew, Adcreep: the Case against Modern Marketing. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:15 pm
., March 7, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits based upon the medical and psychological reports)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:32 pm
., August 18) (affirming denial of disability benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 5:58 pm
., March 17, 2017) (reversing Commissioner denial of disability benefits because the ALJ failed to consider disorder severity and failed to order consultative examinations)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
., June 16, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the Union concluding that agreement requiring that certain positions be staffed with union workers is subject to arbitration provision)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 10:05 pm
., October 113, 2016) (affirming dismissal of Elhelbawy's numerous claims because she did not properly or adequately present evidence in support of her claims)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:28 pm
., October 22, 2015) (reversing and remanding denial of disability benefits for administrative failure to adequately address standing and walking restrictions)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 8:13 pm
., October 9, 2015) (affirming trial court on Housley’s age discrimination (ADEA) claim)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:23 pm
., February 17, 2016) (vacating district court order in light of procedural irregularity an incomplete record, and remanding to insurer for further administrative appeal)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 7:08 pm
., September 9, 2015) (dismissing for lack of jurisdiction)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:11 am
., March 15, 2016) (affirming denial of social security benefits, because Bradley failed to raise his claims below, and his arguments focused on merely technical omissions)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:03 pm
., July 6, 2017) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Kelly Services, although an employee need present no evidence of discriminatory intent, direct or circumstantial, in order to succeed on a failure-to-accommodate claim)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:25 pm
BTW, Mark, have I missed any outbreaks and recalls linked to your product? [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 6:16 pm
., September 26, 2018) (affirming denial of long-term disability benefits under ERISA)*Cases marked with an asterisk are 10th Circuit cases the court declared not to be binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm
It considers each Article in turn and places them in their legal context together with the relevant case law which has affected its interpretation.What the publisher saysThe sweeping changes brought about in 2017 to practice and procedures in European Union trade mark law have precipitated a new edition of this much-relied-upon guide to the field. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
X MARKS THE SPOT: Bill Bradley on Obama's Wright Stuff. [read post]
