Search for: "Matter of T."
Results 1241 - 1260
of 161,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 3:02 pm
[5] Furthermore, the [opponents] rely on decisions T 158/96, T 715/03 and T 630/04 and put forward the following argument: In the three above-cited decisions the boards have ruled that “speculative” or “hypothetical” disclosures do not anticipate claimed subject-matter. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:26 am
I don't believe that has happened here, but the priority for the White House going forward is making sure everyone who discusses this matter, particularly with Congress, is disclosing everything known to themselves or to anyone else in the Administration. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 2:03 am
I've been so busy this summer that I haven't had a chance to blog about some major developments on one of my favorite topics: neighborhoods. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 9:23 am
Many of these seemed obvious but just because you know you should be doing it doesn’t mean you are! [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Hence, the board concludes that the requirements of R 99(1)(a) are met and thereby follows the jurisprudence established in decisions T 920/97 [1], T 475/07 [1.1] and T 1519/08 [2.1]). [2.2.3] Moreover, the board does not agree that the appeal proceedings should be stayed in view of decision T 445/08, pending as referral G 1/12. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:43 am
The subject-matter of claim 1 lacked novelty in view of D1. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 10:22 am
Why that matters. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 10:24 am
“The Conservative Agenda Depends On Judges Being Terrible Historians; By giving lower court judges a task they can’t complete, the Court’s conservatives are setting themselves up as the only amateur historians who matter”: Jacob Hammond has this post at “Balls and Strikes. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 2:18 pm
“Don’t Let Trump’s Abortion Rhetoric Numb You to Kavanaugh’s Distortions; The president’s words are much more bombastic, but it’s the justice’s that will matter”: Dahlia Lithwick has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:27 am
"Supreme Court's conservative majority is making its mark; The conservative justices' influence on constitutional law isn't likely to end soon, no matter who wins the White House in 2012": Erwin Chemerinsky had this op-ed yesterday in The Los Angeles Times. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:42 pm
T 2456/12 Summary of Facts and Submissions[...]VIII. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:07 am
Don't blame potential clients scanning the internet for the right lawyer. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 was novel over D1.D5 was completely silent about the S content. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 10:04 am
In July we began a polling project to measure public confidence in government institutions on national security matters on an ongoing basis. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
In July, we began a polling project to measure public confidence in government institutions on national security matters on an ongoing basis. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:55 am
"JUDI'S JOB WITH PUP-KILLER FIRM" I continue to believe that the stuff that mattered before 9/11 matters much much less in 2007-2008. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 10:49 am
AT&T does not regularly throttle its tiered plan customers, no matter how much data those customers use. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm
Otherwise, don’t buy into the nonsense that some animals matter more than others. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:30 am
" Is it news when something doesn't happen? [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 11:00 am
T 939/92 [2.5.3] or T 311/95 [2.5.7]). [read post]
