Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 1241 - 1260 of 118,869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2022, 3:45 am by Jocelyn Hutton
From Monday 9th May – Tuesday 10th May, the Court will assess costs in Secretary of State for Health and others v Servier Laboratories Ltd and others [2020] UKSC 44. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:18 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
“Gant explicitly recalled, and did not curtail, the automobile exception to the warrant requirement in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:49 pm by U.S.P.T.O.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the case of Therasense v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:00 am
(Since that last claim wasn’t “cognizable as a matter of law,” the AD2 declined to revive it.)I guess they couldn’t have stated it any better.# # #DECISIONK.W. v State of New York# # #COMMENTARY: We believe it's shameful, and hypocritical, that the Attorney General's Office is taking a hard-line position in these cases.In a statement issued on January 28, 2019, in response to the passage of the Child Victims Act, New York State… [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:04 pm
The trier of fact may draw inferences from the facts presented in the case but may not presume an element of the State's case.Held that the Court of Special Appeals erred in affirming the trial court's interpretation and application of the intent element for the crime of second-degree murder. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:54 am by Derek T. Muller
But the Court noted that states may still holds power over them under Article II of the Constitution. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:07 am
This guest Kat steps briefly out of his comfort zone to bring his dear readers slightly belated news of the Court of Appeal decision, handed down on 10 May 2012, in Nokia v IPCom [full citation:  Nokia OYJ (Nokia Corporation) v IPCom GmbH & Co Kg [2012] EWCA Civ 567 (10 May 2012)]. [read post]
13 May 2009, 2:23 am
Symeou v Public Prosecutor's Office at the Court of Appeals, Patras, Greece Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The abuse of process jurisdiction in extradition proceedings did not include misconduct or bad faith by police in the requesting state. [read post]