Search for: "McCarthy and McCarthy" Results 1241 - 1260 of 4,989
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2020, 2:01 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
“Federal privacy laws, such as HIPAA, can create complexities for many plan sponsors as they attempt to weigh the privacy rights of an employee or dependent who has contracted COVID-19 against preserving public safety, including that of the employee’s or dependent’s co-workers, family, and friends,” according to a blog post from Morgan Lewis attorneys Saghi Fattahian and Michelle McCarthy. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 2:01 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
“Federal privacy laws, such as HIPAA, can create complexities for many plan sponsors as they attempt to weigh the privacy rights of an employee or dependent who has contracted COVID-19 against preserving public safety, including that of the employee’s or dependent’s co-workers, family, and friends,” according to a blog post from Morgan Lewis attorneys Saghi Fattahian and Michelle McCarthy. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:01 pm by Doug Austin
As reported by The Register (Zoom goes boom, Teams tears at seams: Technology stumbles at the first hurdle for this homeworking malarkey, written by Kieren McCarthy – hat tip to Sharon Nelson of the excellent...Read the whole entry... [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:18 pm by Michel-Adrien
Canadian law firm McCarthy Tetrault has been producing updates about the legal implications of the COVID-19 pandemic.The material covers insurance losses, tax measures, the impact on contractual obligations, federal and provincial emergency powers, cyber issues, cancellations in the court system, and more. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Victoria Nourse
United States (1957), a McCarthy-era case in which “bad” congressional motive—to embarrass individuals with ties to communists—was palpable, the court nevertheless held that “motives alone would not vitiate an investigation which had been instituted by a House of Congress if that assembly’s legislative purpose is being served. [read post]
” This is a good time to reemphasize policies against accessing personal health records without a legitimate purpose, according to Fattahian and McCarthy. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:38 pm by David Bernstein
In fact, I challenged a couple of longstanding McCarthy critics on Twitter to explain why the McCarthy tweet was antisemitic, but the Warren flyer is not. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 12:27 pm by Elliot Setzer
The committee will hear testimony from Ryan McCarthy, the secretary of the army, and Gen. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Finally, Part III offers two detailed case studies of overspeech: the [Nye] Munitions Inquiry of the mid-1930s, and the McCarthy and Army-McCarthy Hearings of the early-1950s. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Leroy McCarthy was also serving a suspended sentence for abusing police officers. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 4:42 am by Rob Robinson
Read the complete article at Brave Browser Now Automatically Points to Wayback Machine on 404 Extract from an article by Kieren McCarthy from The Register Archive.org’s Wayback Machine is Legit Legal Evidence, US Appeals Court Judges Rule Analysis: The Wayback Machine’s archive of webpages is legitimate evidence that may be used in litigation, a US appeals court has decided. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 10:28 am by Chain | Cohn | Stiles
Joan Johnson has penned letters to local elected officials, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and Lindsey Graham, chairman of the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 10:28 am by Chain | Cohn | Stiles
Joan Johnson has penned letters to local elected officials, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and Lindsey Graham, chairman of the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Bob Bauer, Jack Goldsmith
On the one hand, the express limits on the pardon power (to federal crimes and excluding impeachment) might imply that there are no other limits, and the exception for impeachment might imply, as Andrew McCarthy noted, that “the Framers understood they were permitting the president to pardon himself” for crimes. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Then the court says that likely confusion must be “particularly compelling” to outweigh the First Amendment interests at stake, and that “the deception or confusion must be relatively obvious and express, not subtle or implied” (quoting McCarthy, and then the odious Gordon v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:34 pm by Elliot Setzer
McCarthy, Secretary of the Army; Hon. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:19 am by Chris Wesner
McCarthy (In re McCarthy), 488 B.R. 814, 825 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2013)); see also H.R. [read post]