Search for: "Morales v. United States" Results 1241 - 1260 of 3,161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2008, 12:10 pm
The best way of seeing the tension is to look at the history of Brown v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Religion has won a number of victories recently at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm by Peter Vickery
 Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm by Peter Vickery
 Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest." [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-6602; Cox v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:39 am by Roger Alford
According to the statute, such an asset is one that is: “(A) held in the United States for a foreign securities intermediary doing business in the United States, (B) a blocked asset [defined as those involving Peterson v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Echoing arguments by Theda Skocpol on Civil War pensions, DPADR argues that the various forms of debt relief offered by 19th-century state legislatures constituted a sort of proto-welfare state. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm by David Bernstein
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of one’s… [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Bill Raftery
However, that effort was struck down by Federal courts only a day or two after the election (Awad v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm by David Kopel
But that's a decision to be made under the amendment process of Article V. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 12:50 pm by Steve Hall
As it is, the United States is the only nation that sentences teenagers who are convicted of a nonhomicide crime to life in prison with no chance of parole. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:31 pm
United States (1878) to Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:59 am
Furthermore, (iii) compensation for non-financial losses (e.g. droit moral infringements and the like) is entitled in the Danish Act on Copyright. [read post]