Search for: "Orin Kerr"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 3,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
(Orin Kerr) Peter Wehner has a very good essay on civility as a political virtue over at Commentary’s Contentions blog. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
(Ilya Somin) In his response to my post on the mandate cases and the presumption of constitutionality, Orin Kerr argues that the presumption applies to all cases where courts consider the constitutionality of congressional legislation.Orin recognizes that the Supreme Court majority in fact fails to even mention the presumption in many controversial cases where it strikes down federal laws, such as United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 2:40 am
The discussion reminded me of some comments that I made in response to a post here at Prawfs by Orin Kerr three (gasp!) [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 4:55 am
Damn that Orin Kerr with his tough questions. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 8:45 pm
(Orin Kerr) In response to my earlier post on the Obama Administration’s decision not to defend DOMA, Walter Dellinger writes in via e-mail (posted with his permission):Orin, your post comparing what the Justice Department has announced it will do in DOMA cases to some of John Yoo’s theories of presidential power doesn’t give proper weight to the enormous difference between refusing to obey a law (which the Bush administration did — and secretly!) [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Orin Kerr countered that a discussion of the rhetoric of free speech should also acknowledge the rhetorical impact of using the language of civil rights. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 3:06 am
That was the question that Orin Kerr at Volokh Conspiracy asked and then answered. [read post]
23 May 2007, 12:33 pm
Unlike Orin Kerr, I haven't limited myself to an hour of the Monica Goodling testimony today. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:29 pm
(Ilya Somin) In his response to my post on why going without health insurance doesn’t qualify as an “activity” that Congress can regulate under the Commerce Clause, Orin Kerr claims that my reasoning “begins with an assumption as to how much power Congress has, and he then reasons backwards to infer the meaning of ‘activity’ in order to make that assumption correct. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:21 am
Orin Kerr has a very good post up describing six ways in which the new electronic surveillance law includes privacy protections that were not in the 2007 Protect America Act (PAA). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) Does government collection of cell-site records implicate the Fourth Amendment after United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:51 pm
(Orin Kerr) Over at Freespace, former VC guest-blogger Tim Sandefur argues that I am guilty of “inconsistent positivism” in two series of posts I have written. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 4:38 am
GW Lawprof Orin Kerr, who is known for his lengthy and well conceived posts on significant legal issues, showed his lighter side when he posted about The Ultimate Legal Blog Comment? [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 am
This post by Orin Kerr about the history of airplane screening was interesting. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 7:52 am
Orin Kerr reports on the generally increasing number of citations to the Volokh Conspiracy in Westlaw's JLR (that's its journals and law reviews) database. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:35 am
Orin Kerr has a very interesting commentary on the Supreme Court's recent opinion in Maryland v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm
At SCOTUSblog, Orin Kerr has this summary of the Fourth Amendment cases for the U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 10:49 pm
(Orin Kerr) This fascinating comment thread at Prawfs on the experience of submitting law review articles suggests it would be helpful to have a thread on the latest practices in law review offer windows. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:45 pm
(Orin Kerr) Joni Hersch and Kip Viscusi have posted an interesting paper counting the number of law professors at the “top” schools that have Ph.D. degrees. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:06 pm
(Orin Kerr) Legal Times reports that Senators McCain, Isakson, and Graham are supporting the filibuster of 9th Circuit nominee Goodwin Liu, and that all are citing the same reason: Liu’s inflammatory testimony against Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito in 2006.Reasonable people can disagree about whether Liu should be confirmed. [read post]
