Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 6,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am
The Convention also forbade States parties from conferring such immunities from (severe) criticism on their own (republican) heads of State (Artun and Güvener v Turkey, para 31; Pakdemirli v Turkey, paras 52 et seq). [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:15 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:28 pm
v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:35 pm
This question is going to be answered in EUIPO v Nowhere (case C-337/22 P) for opposition proceedings and in Shopify v EUIPO (case C-751/22 P) in invalidity proceedings. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:56 am
" (citing United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
Such absolute rules were not rare (James v UK App No 8793/79 para 47). [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
Such absolute rules were not rare (James v UK App No 8793/79 para 47). [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] Can a state immunize its agencies from federal antitrust law through judicial review?
13 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
See Cantor v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
(See Pate v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 2:45 am
First, the Court adopted a much more tranchant language in relation to the fair compensation requirement than the one employed in earlier decisions [in particular: Copydan (here) and Reprobel (here)].Despite the wording of Recital 35 in the preamble to the InfoSoc Directive, at para 17 of the decision [see also para 48] the CJEU stated that:"where Member States decide to introduce the exception, provided for in… [read post]
30 May 2022, 7:15 am
," Geographical, 28 April 2022 [text]Reports:Guidance: Afghan refugees and newly displaced populations: overview and principles (Govt. of the UK, April 2022) [text]Humanitarian Pathways for Central Americans: Assessing Opportunities for the Future = Vías humanitarias para personas centroamericanas: Evaluando oportunidades para el futuro (Migration Policy Institute, May 2022) [access]- Follow link for texts in both English and Spanish.Knowledge Brief Series… [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:22 am
[para 76]The first ground of appeal was thus rejected. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:59 pm
§ §856, 920; Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, Part IV, ¶45.f(1) (2008). [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm
In A.T. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
As I stated above, the Court of Appeal reversed that stay, and this issue is not on appeal before us. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
See: Rogers Cable TV Ltd v. 373041 Ontario Ltd., 1994 CanLII 7367 (ON SC), (1994), 22 O.R. (3d) 25 (Gen.Div) at para. 4; Bluestone v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
" (para. 177). [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:24 am
From Lord v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:31 pm
Yovich v. [read post]
