Search for: "Parker v Parker"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 2,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2021, 6:03 am
The Court of Appeals (Parker, Cabranes and Newman) says does not have this evidence. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 7:38 am
This may be the most significant federal ruling on the rights of graffiti artists.The case is Castillo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 8:01 am
It devolves into a discussion about an obscure abstention principle governing when federal courts may decide cases that raise similar issues to those raised in state court.The case is Kanciper v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:17 am
This case highlights the distinctions between federal false arrest claims and state law malicious prosecution claims.The case is Shen v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:19 am
The Court of Appeals has thrown out a Title VII retaliation verdict, ruling that the plaintiff did not engage in protected activity under the statute.The case is Rosioreanu v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:06 am
The content of plaintiff's speech was strictly personal, the Court of Appeals (Parker, Hall and Livingston) says. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:13 am
The case was dismissed on summary judgment, but the Court of Appeals revives plaintiff's due process claim.The case is Victory v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:07 am
Case Name: MERIT ENERGY COMPANY v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
"The case is Robinson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:22 am
The family gets a new trial.The case is Harris v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:55 am
Parker comes from Lyle Denniston for this blog and Mark Walsh for Education Week. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
Warby Parker * Court Dismisses Trademark Claims Over Internal Search Results–Las Vegas Skydiving v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:26 am
The appellant in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:35 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 6:36 am
Parker, 2007 U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
Here, plaintiff’s allegation that Bellinson’s advice denied him the full value of his malpractice suit against Pepperman was “purely conclusory” (Murray Hill Invs. v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 305 AD2d 228, 229 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:13 pm
Invitrogen Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
Warby Parker * Court Dismisses Trademark Claims Over Internal Search Results–Las Vegas Skydiving v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:45 am
” Parker v. [read post]
