Search for: "Parker v. Parker" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2011, 2:53 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 410(4) states that: Except as otherwise provided in this rule, evidence of the following is not admissible against the defendant who made the plea or was a participant in the plea discussions:...... [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:50 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 609(b) provides that Evidence of a conviction under this rule is not admissible if a period of more than ten years has elapsed since the date of the conviction or of... [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:32 pm by Giles Peaker
Parker, R (On the Application Of) v Bashir & Anor (2022) EWHC 358 (Admin) on costs in Environmental Protection Act prosecutions. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:25 am by Nathan Koppel
A student at Little Rock’s Central High School Fifty-seven years after the Supreme Court’s Brown v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:28 am by Mack Sperling
Lawyers defending against punitive damages claims ought to put on their dancing shoes after the North Carolina Supreme Court's decision Friday in Scarborough v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:18 am by Daniel Hemel
That — more or less — is the central question in Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am by Conor McEvily
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 10:19 am by Robert Liles
A Look Back at Hospice Audits and Prosecutions in 2020 — Are You Ready for 2021? [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Allison Tirres
Of course, these taxes would give rise to the Passenger Cases in 1849 and to Henderson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:25 am by Eric Goldman
Warby Parker * Court Dismisses Trademark Claims Over Internal Search Results–Las Vegas Skydiving v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:16 pm by Jani
The machine-to-transformation is not, according to the US Supreme Court, the only definitive test, but more of "...a useful and important clue, an investigative tool, for determining whether some claimed inventions are processes under §101".Gavin always thought in the abstractThe majority's decision hinged heavily on its previous decisions of Gottschalk v Benson, Parker v Flook and Diamond v Diehr. [read post]