Search for: "Paul King" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2011, 11:42 am by PunditMom
Congressman Peter “I’m going to hold hearings on whether American Muslims are terrorists” King? [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:15 am by David Lat
Partner [The Careerist]Earlier: Paul Clement and King & Spalding Defend DOMA — at a Discount [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:32 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) The BLT Blog notes a story in The Daily Report (for subscribers only) that suggests the flap over King & Spalding’s on-and-off representation of the House of Representatives in DOMA litigation was due to a misunderstanding about the firm’s internal vetting process. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:53 am by David Ingram
The newspaper reports other new details about King & Spalding’s reversal, including that the firm’s client-vetting committee did not examine the House’s contract until after then-partner Paul Clement signed it. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:28 pm
Here is the account I gave in an earlier post:Consider, just for one such instance, the history of King's Chapel in Boston. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE KINGDOM OF IRAQ AND THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The President of the United States of America on the one part and His Majesty the King of Iraq on the other part Being desirous to conclude a Treaty for the extradition of criminals, have appointed the following Plenipotentiaries: The President of the United States of America: Paul Knabenshue, Minister Resident of the United States of America in Baghdad His Majesty the King… [read post]
5 May 2011, 7:00 am
These rules of professional ethics govern doctors and lawyers in their day-to-day conduct; witness the recent kerfuffle over King & Spaulding's decision to withdraw from defending the Defense of Marriage Act before the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:29 pm by Steven Harper
What should have been a nonevent became a major story because the firm said yes to former partner Paul Clement's representation of House Republicans in Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) litigation--and then it said no. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:09 am by Juggalo Law
[WSJ Law Blog]* In the wake of the King & Spalding mess, a look at how other law firms vet controversial clients. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:12 pm by Mandelman
Originally posted in October 2010… Re-posted at request of readers. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:10 am by Laurie Lin
. - Joshua, meanwhile, rocks our world with a master’s in international relations and a PhD in war studies from King’s College London (he was a Marshall scholar). [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:32 am by Maxwell Kennerly
King & Spalding should have recognized that their heart was not in defending DOMA, told Paul Clement as much, and called it a day, and they embarrassed themselves by accepting then rejecting the representation. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:07 am by Ted Frank
Neither is an especially big client of the firm (and both were probably with the firm because of Paul Clement rather than the firm's reputation, so would likely have followed Clement to Bancroft anyway), but more King & Spalding clients should consider carefully Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli's reasoning. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:00 am by Mike Scarcella
The partner handling the litigation, Paul Clement, abruptly left the firm when it decided to abandon the cases. [read post]