Search for: "People v Court"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 61,621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2019, 2:38 pm
See what you think about this one.The backpack in the car almost certainly belonged to one of the three people in the vehicle. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:29 pm
Adrien Camacho shoots and kills a police officer during a routine traffic stop in front of lots of people for basically no reason, so it's not at all surprising that (1) he's sentenced to death, and that (2) the California Supreme Court unanimously affirms.Mr. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:16 am
The case, Maryland v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 9:44 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:50 am
Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Chapman v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:57 am
The Court held People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:02 pm
CONREP is not the Court of Appeal. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:54 am
The Court of Appeal therefore held the ‘other case’ evidence should only have been admitted for the limited purpose of demonstrating that the bookshop’s readership included people who were prepared to commit terrorist acts. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:30 am
Hirsi v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 6:54 am
In Salman v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:28 pm
The Court of Appeal is exactly right. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 4:20 am
The Tampa, Florida, case, UGM v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
At long last, the Supreme Court has issued an opinion in Elonis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:47 am
In a recent Colorado Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:47 am
In a recent Colorado Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:26 pm
The trial court sentenced him to 18 years to life. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:28 pm
I appreciate the fact that appointed counsel have to raise on appeal (and the Court of Appeal has to decide) any nonfrivolous argument in favor of the criminal defendant. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 3:29 pm
Justice Cornell writes a concurring opinion in this case to try to be helpful to trial courts in confronting the challenges involved when a criminal pro per defendant may potentially be disruptive.Let me add another one:Chill out. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:11 pm
By Jack Wass (Stout Street Chambers, Wellington, New Zealand) In the recent decision of Hebei Huaneng Industrial Development Co Ltd v Shi,[1] the High Court of New Zealand was faced with an argument that a money judgment of the Higher People’s Court of Hebei should not be enforced because the courts of China are not independent of the political arms of government and therefore do not qualify as “courts” for the purpose of… [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
In Miranda v. [read post]
