Search for: "People v Favors"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 10,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2021, 10:33 am
Neumann v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 12:35 pm
EFF’s brief argued in favor of the expelled student, focusing on the Supreme Court’s strong protection for student speech rights in its decision from this summer in Mahanoy v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:03 pm
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 11:47 am
Indeed, under the standard set forth in Roth v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 10:21 am
Holley failed to convince the district court that his plea should be vacated because Newman changed the law in his favor, and the SEC has now filed a brief in the appeal of that decision (SEC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 7:06 am
The case is Clerveaux v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:01 pm
When in doubt, rule in favor of the worker. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
N.L.R.B. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:46 am
The Second Circuit reverses summary judgment and finds that a jury may rule in plaintiffs' favor on their false arrest claim because the police did not conclusively establish that they had probable cause to think the house was abandoned.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:30 am
K&D, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Those attending a shareholder proposal meeting on behalf of management are unlikely to be the same people negotiating with the union. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 8:06 am
In People v Jenkins (2008 NY Slip Op 07992 [10/23/08]) the Court of Appeals considered who has to prove what in order for a defendant to be entitled to specific compliance of a plea agreement. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:23 am
” People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:06 pm
” In a prior case (BMG v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:37 am
Proposing the “no endorsement” test in Lynch v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
Indiana, in which the justices ruled unanimously “that the constitution protects people accused of crimes from having outlandish sums seized by city or state authorities. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm
Justice O’Donnell favored the Reds with a question about whether the team used the bobbleheads to supplement less desirable tickets. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:36 pm
In 2012, Scioto Insurance Company v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:51 am
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
