Search for: "People v Jones" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2014, 6:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Force people to identify themselves, promoting self-surveillance. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
It cautioned against relying on evidence of people's reactions after that date when the series had been extremely successful. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
In Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
However, occasionally judges simply reject Section 230 because they don’t like it (this year’s crop include Jones v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:40 am by Lisa Milam-Perez
Supreme Court heard oral argument Monday in the eagerly anticipated NLRB v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:11 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court heard oral argument in the eagerly anticipated NLRB v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Ron Coleman
 Contrast this with the old fashioned approach of learning things and meeting actual people. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm by Miriam Baer
 And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage in that action too intensively and… [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
Jones that the doctrine was "ill suited to the digital age, in which people reveal a great deal of information about themselves to third parties in the course of carrying out mundane tasks." [read post]