Search for: "People v. Bush"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 2,187
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2011, 8:58 am
Supreme Court ultimately invalidated in its decision in New Process Steel L.P. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 8:57 am
Bush appointed David Souter. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:28 am
There is, of course, a far more recent precedent for the idea that the judiciary is entitled to review executive determinations regarding the existence or non-existence of armed conflict: Hamdan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:35 am
Bush’s first term. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Liebeck v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:19 pm
It could say ‘Look, this is an extremely divisive issue — much like the situation in Bush v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:02 pm
The Republicans could demand, say, a constitutional amendment overruling Roe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
As Serwer says, "if Bush v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm
Bush to the U.S. [read post]
Following Judge Sutton’s rejection of the “inactivity” argument, the Supreme Court can take its time
5 Aug 2011, 1:00 pm
Bush named Sutton to the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:03 pm
I read with interest today of Grant Shapps plans to make it quicker and easier for social landlords to evict people for anti-social behaviour. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:28 pm
Bush administrations. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:53 pm
For example, last year, at the candidates’ lounge, I found three faculty hopefuls debating Bush v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
I stand by my initial reaction to that decision, and especially the pivotal concurrence by Bush-appointed Judge Jeffrey Sutton, as well as the longer critique I published ten days later. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 7:22 am
Bush between them appointed four of those Justices and elevated the fifth to Chief Justice.) [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:01 pm
He has calmly explained that presidential authority to keep the public debt valid is a far more tame innovation than the unitary executive prerogatives entertained during the rule of Bush fils. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:48 pm
This may be the most partisan, ideologically charged case to reach the Court since Bush v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:37 am
After Bush v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:13 pm
Its important to remember the the Supreme Court has already ruled that EPA cannot consider cost in selecting a standard (ATA v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:54 pm
It is not a partisan opinion that (i) George Bush ran the country for 8 years (and until three years ago); (ii) Democrats can not pass effective legislation to solve the budged deficit because they need (and don’t have)60% of the vote in the Senate to avoid filibusters (which Republicans do to get their way); (iii) Democrats can not pass effective legislation to solve the budget deficit because the Republicans control the house of Representatives; (iv) under his administration,… [read post]
