Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 1241 - 1260 of 5,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2008, 8:09 pm
On July 29, the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District upheld the verdict in Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 8:33 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
People sometimes shy away from taking such action because they fear seeming overly-litigious and don’t want to sue someone they love. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 12:00 pm
The first is authored by cross-town friend and UH law prof Jim Hawkins (pictured) and is titled   "Doctors as Bankers: Evidence from Fertility Markets. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 5:30 am
Stewart'76, Pulitzer Prize Winner, 3-time Loeb Award Winner, and NYT Bestselling Author of Den of Thieves and Disney War; Jeffrey Toobin'86, New Yorker Staff Writer, CNN Legal Correspondent, and NYT Bestselling Author of The Run of His Life: The People v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
  In their August 6, 2009 Chicago superseding indictment filed in USA v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 8:33 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
People sometimes shy away from taking such action because they fear seeming overly-litigious and don’t want to sue someone they love. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Florida and the plaintiffs will cross-appeal the 11th Circuit ruling to the Supreme Court in the very near future. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 8:47 am by WIRED
If such plans are enacted and withstand legal scrutiny, one of the key technologies that could be deployed to track people trying to cross state lines is automated license plate readers (ALPRs). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am by UKSC Blog
We had a case which we handed down last week – Takhar v Gracefield Developments Limited and others [2019] UKSC 13. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:11 am by CMS
The proposed class is vast, comprising an estimated 46.2 million people. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:03 am
And certainly the defendant has a constitutional right to confront his or her accusers; I would say that the state has the equal right to make sure the people who are rebutting their potential case are confronted directly in court as well. . . . [read post]