Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 1241 - 1260 of 5,637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” And, at a similarly crucial point in Matal v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Tabatha Abu El-HajIn my last post, I suggested that McKesson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am by INFORRM
Comparative human rights law Baldassi & Others in 2020 reaches the same conclusion as the Supreme Court of the United States in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 2:22 pm by Ana Muñoz
Domestic Workers Bill of Rights The Domestic Workers Bill of Rights, which took effect in 2015, offers broad protection to people who provide “any service of a domestic nature within a household. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
This is the highest fine ever imposed by the Belgian DPA. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Endorsement by Monroe means something v. different from endorsement by ABG but courts have refused to distinguish those things. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am by David Super
United States, 493 U.S. 265, 279 (1990), the Court overturned contempt fines against city councilmembers whom it agreed had violated both civil rights laws and a consent judgment to which they had agreed. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
Some people think of this as a sign of courage; others as an unwarranted smugness. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm by Kit Walsh
In response to a petition signed by 114,000 people, the U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The larger problem is the still uncertain issue of de facto secondary meaning: if the SCt opinion means that there is no remaining doctrine of de facto secondary meaning, then the survey as conducted in Booking is fine. [read post]