Search for: "People v. London"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2012, 7:13 am
The second trial of Mr Fraser came after he successfully appealed his conviction to the UK Supreme Court in London last year : Fraser (Appellant) v Her Majesty's Advocate (pdf)The Crown Office released the following statement : Nat Fraser convicted of wife murderNat Fraser was today found guilty of murdering his wife Arlene Fraser in Elgin in April 1998. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am
Lord Denning Jarvis v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am
Lawcast 203: Kristen Heimark – From serving on the USS Lexington to practising as a London lawyer Today I am talking to Kristen Heimark, a practising lawyer in London who started her working life serving with the United States Navy on the USS Lexington. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am
Oh, and the slow train into London was lightly scented with vomit. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:00 am
Wade, Kelo v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:57 pm
Plessy v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am
New York ; London : Academic Press, 1971 BF 319.5 A8 A94 1971 Aversive conditioning and learning / edited by F. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm
[Link] The C5's 11th Annual International Conference on Maximising Pharma Patent Lifecycles conference will be held June 20-21 in London. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
Keeping statutes up to date Richard Ekins has written a piece on the UK Constitutional Law Group blog on the recent decision in Yemshaw v London Borough of Hounslow [2011] UKSC 3. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am
But not everything a politician says is political (see Livingstone v Adjudication Panel for England [2006] EWHC 2533 (Admin) [36] where it was judged that the then-London mayor Ken Livingstone’s comments were not expressing political opinion, but were instead to be seen as simply as the offensive abuse of a journalist). [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:02 am
However, and this is essential, it still requires the violation of the dignity of one or more concrete persons, and not of an abstract group such as ‘the Congolese’ or black people in general. [read post]
9 May 2012, 2:51 am
His first business venture, a tin factory on London's Oxford St, failed. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm
Chick-fil-a’s Eat Mor Chikn v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
London School of Economics. 11 May 2012, 5pm, T [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:47 am
But not everything a politician says is political (see Livingstone v Adjudication Panel for England [2006] EWHC 2533 (Admin) §36 where it was judged that the then-London mayor Ken Livingstone’s comments were not expressing political opinion, but were instead to be seen as simply as the offensive abuse of a journalist). [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm
This case is briefly commented on by Ian McDonald, writing for Liberty, who considers the decision a vindication of the right to free speech – that people should, in a democratic society, be allowed to voice even insulting opinions without fear of reprisal. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:03 am
V (1) (a) of the New York Convention (NYC) for having failed to initiate set-aside proceedings under the lex arbitri. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
English cases in this category included: Smith v ADFVN ([2008] EWHC 1797 (QB)); Clift v Clarke [2011] EWHC 1164 (QB); and El Diwany v Hansen and Others ([2011] EWHC 2077 (QB)) . [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:48 pm
Survivors of the London Blitz describe the distinctive—and terrifying—psychological impact of the noise made by Hitler’s V-1 rockets (or “Buzz Bombs”) as these “pilotless bombers” flew into southern England. [read post]
