Search for: "People v. Shorts" Results 1241 - 1260 of 8,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:19 pm by Eric Goldman
Here’s a short list of the things I like least: * a new bastardized multi-factor consumer confusion test for keyword advertising. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
In November 1994, Le Soir published an article reporting on a series of fatal car accidents which had occurred in a short period of time (“the Article”). [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Hearsay only applies to statements by people—computer-generated statements don’t have a hearsay problem. __ This seems like a win, of sorts, for platforms, although not a great result for Cox specifically. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:07 am by Emma Emery
  People may find texts like these mildly irritating but it is another thing altogether to say they caused substantial damage or distress. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 3:08 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Local housing authorities have statutory obligations under the Housing Act 1996, Pt VII to provide assistance to people who are homeless in certain circumstances. [read post]
23 May 2010, 7:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm by Donald Thompson
Cir 2004]), whether it was or wasn't a “matter” is probably an argument best avoided altogether.In short, when a government agent asks question of a citizen, the citizen may decline to answer the question or answer it honestly but he cannot with impunity knowingly and willfully answer with a falsehood (Bryson v United States, 396 US 64 [1969]). [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:33 am
 We are pretty lax about putting people back into prison. [read post]