Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 72,895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2008, 6:02 pm
Dude, I know you like weed. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
Usually when a statute says "shall" it means "must". [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:20 pm
This -- among many, many other reasons -- is why you should not visit a prostitute, and surely should not pull into a back alley to receive your promised services.Because you might well get shot and killed. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:33 pm
pdfs.nycourts.gov – /PeopleVs.DTrump-71543/transcripts/ [To Parent Directory] 5/13/2024 4:31 PM 2239131 4-22-2024.pdf 5/13/2024 4:34 PM 2488456 4-23-2024.pdf 5/13/2024 4:34 PM 3407978 4-25-2024.pdf 5/13/2024 4:34 PM 3453757 4-26-2024.pdf 5/13/2024 4:34 PM 3355432 4-30-2024.pdf 5/13/2024 4:34 PM 3540025 5-02-2024.pdf 5/13/2024 4:34 PM 3363923 5-03-2024.pdf 5/7/2024 10:30 PM <dir> 5-06-2024 5/9/2024 1:53 PM … [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 3:46 pm
A tiny snippet from this opinion:"Defendant began drinking beer and smoking marijuana around 3:00 p.m., consuming approximately 33 beers. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 3:23 pm
You're outside an adult bookstore in Hollywood, with a semiautomatic pistol in your waistband, when you buy $40 worth of cocaine from two guys who walk up to you. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:48 pm
I will express no opinion about the merits of Justice Nicholson's concurrence in this case, in which he argues that the vast majority of the Court of Appeal's opinion is unnecessary and unhelpful.He's surely right, however, that the most important part of this opinion -- to the litigants, anyway -- is its core finding that a guy convicted of having wire cutters while shoplifting from a store isn't carrying a "deadly weapon" such that he's categorically ineligible… [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 12:01 pm
Sometimes you don't know whether to laugh or cry:"The events giving rise to the crimes charged against Morton occurred on November 7, 2004. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 9:20 pm
Throughout the history of Anglo-American jurisprudence, for almost half a millennium, a defendant has had the right to allocute after being convicted of a crime. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 7:05 pm
Here's yet another reason not to attempt to escape from custody once your trial has started. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm
Let's say you decide to carry a knife. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:06 pm
On the "low level litigation" front, here's a neat little published opinion from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:02 pm
Maybe this year's a bad one for computer integration as well. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
I don't know why the Court of Appeal decided not to publish Part I of this opinion. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:27 pm
Comparing cross-jurisdictional debates is sometimes enlightening. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:27 pm
There's nothing published by the Ninth Circuit or the California appellate courts today. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:06 pm
This is a case about a 28-year old defendant who was sentenced to 63 years in prison for a string of robberies. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:16 pm
Okay, I understand this holding given the relevant statutory language. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
This is an otherwise routine death penalty case in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:13 pm
Defendant has one DUI. [read post]
