Search for: "ROBERT ROE"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2007, 2:45 am
A Supreme Court ruling in the D.C. gun- ban case 'could do for gun-control advocates what Roe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 8:23 am
What if Roe Fell? [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 7:34 am
Of course, he’s not alone in being snookered these days, but at least he gets a platform to point it out (however more gentlemanly than I could): Supreme Confusion Senator Dianne Feinstein of California asked whether I thought a Justice Roberts would vote to overrule Roe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 7:03 pm
"Here's the This Week roundtable with George Stephanopoulos, George Will, Cokie Roberts, and Sam Donaldson. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 1:01 pm
It was in that year the Court decided Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:06 pm
Casey [, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)] and Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:15 pm
Casey or Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 4:17 pm
Thus, while Roberts and Alito gave lip service in their confirmation hearings to the importance of observing precedent and following established law, they did just the opposite in this case, granting certiorari -- despite the fact that all three appellate courts to consider the Act applied the same controlling precedent and came to the same holding -- and overruling a recent ruling disfavored by the new majority.In addition to directly overturning Stenberg's mandate to protect… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:26 pm
Roberts, Jr., and Justice Samuel A. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:16 am
Balkin continues: On the other hand, if Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:45 am
Roberts and Alito will not vote to overturn Roe/Casey. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:12 am
" Kennedy's vote with the majority; Roberts and ScAlito joined Scalia and Thomas, makes clear that those of us who fought against both the Roberts and Alito nominations were right to expect this from those nominees. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:41 am
The vote was 5-4, Kennedy writing the majority opinion, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:20 am
But the assumption also allows CJ Roberts and Justice Alito to remain in the closet about whether they would vote to overrule Roe and Casey if faced with that question directly. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:27 am
(An additional virtue, if it is one, is that it gives Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito a little more time to work out their views on stare decisis, Casey, and Roe, before being outed by necessity.) [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:58 am
I write separately to reiterate my view that the Court's abortion jurisprudence, including Casey and Roe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:14 am
There is no middle ground.Braden's essay was written before the Warren Court, before Brown and Roe and Bakke, before Bush v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 8:05 am
Justice Kennedy, not Chief Justice Roberts, was the author of the Court's majority opinion in Garcetti v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
At PrawfsBlawg, Jessie Hill has this post, the last in a three-part series, entitled "Overruling Roe v. [read post]
