Search for: "ROSS v. STATE" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2007, 12:54 am
Feb 06, 2007) (NO. 153, 6272/85)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Joanne Legano Ross of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:35 pm by John Elwood
Ross, 21-468Issues: (1) Whether allegations that a state law has dramatic economic effects largely outside of the state and requires pervasive changes to an integrated nationwide industry state a violation of the dormant commerce clause, or whether the extraterritoriality principle described in the Supreme Court’s decisions is now a dead letter; and (2) whether such allegations, concerning a law that is based solely on preferences regarding… [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm by Josh Blackman
S. 267, 279 (1978), and "try novel social and economic experiments" if they wish, New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
Ross Runkel looks at Lamps Plus at his eponymous blog. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:51 pm
Midrex Div., Midland Ross Corp., 556 P.2d 1337, 1339 (Or. 1976) (en banc) (citations omitted); see also Miner v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
See a succinct summary of the majority’s reasoning in Vavilov by Rebecca Ross, a student at Osgoode Hall Law School, [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am by Kia Rahnama
The Supreme Court has already directly borrowed this principle in analyzing the scope of congressional contempt power, stating in Anderson v. [read post]