Search for: "Ruth, Appeal of"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 2,324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2016, 2:34 pm
Justices Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented from that announcement. [read post]
31 May 2016, 7:32 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:52 am
” In a second story, Mauro also reports on recent remarks by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who described Scalia as not only “a dear colleague and friend” but also a “discerning shopper. [read post]
28 May 2016, 5:35 am
Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
27 May 2016, 7:03 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:25 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:22 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am
To the same end and in much the same form, Bill S-225 was subsequently introduced into the Senate by Senators Larry Campbell and Nancy Ruth. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:27 am
Slate's Dahlia Lithwick says Trump's SCOTUS choices are bad for women: The list consists of six federal appeals court judges (all appointed by George W. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
The case involves a California rule barring review of claims that were not raised on direct appeal. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm
On appeal, the Montana Supreme Court joined a fifteen-court (state and federal) split, ruling that the Sixth Amendment speedy-trial right does not apply to sentencing. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:52 am
Two huge cases challenging new voting restrictions will soon be heard by the federal courts of appeal. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:10 pm
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote separately to underscore the Court’s silence and to warn lower courts against combing the ruling for “signals of where this Court stands. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:14 am
Most courts of appeals have rejected this claim, and rightly so. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:06 am
’” Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s concurrence with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg optimistically echoes the compromise possibility, noting: Today’s opinion does only what it says it does: “afford[s] an opportunity” for the parties and Courts of Appeals to reconsider the parties’ arguments in light of petitioners’ new articulation of their religious objection and the Government’s clarification about what the existing regulations… [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:07 pm
And if it does, Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg rightly point out, “the Courts of Appeals remain free to reach the same conclusion” they did before on the legality of the government’s accommodation. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:45 pm
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented from the majority’s ruling, in an opinion joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
16 May 2016, 11:35 am
We’re on to the next decision, from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in Sheriff v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:53 am
The basic problem, in the words of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s opinion for a unanimous Court, is that the “letterhead conveys on whose authority special counsel writes to the debtor. [read post]
16 May 2016, 8:46 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, wrote separately to stress that the Court had not decided any of the legal questions it considered in the cases, under the lead case’s title, Zubik v. [read post]
