Search for: "S W" Results 1241 - 1260 of 53,835
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
" Over at Legal History Miscellany, Richard W. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:17 am by Jack Bogdanski
Shane Kavanaugh of the O had the story in a couple of tweets yesterday: In a follow-up statement, Rubio, is now accusing her council colleague — and mayoral rival — Rene Gonzalez of not "meaningfully" & "authentically" engaging w/ JVP's office. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Eric Fruits
But to say that there’s been some pushback on The Markup’s data and methodology would be a huge understatement. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:49 am by Brian Finucane
… [W]e do not share this expansive interpretation of Common Article 1 …. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am by Alex Phipps
Turning to defendant’s arguments, the Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court’s substitution of an alternate juror was error. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Evan Brown
Buhl, 90 A.3d 331 (2014), the court observed that “[w]ithout further legislative action, however, there is little [this court can] do in [its] limited role but join with other courts and commentators in expressing [its] concern with the statute’s broad scope. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Klara Nedrelow
”[17] As Judge Sebutinde noted in her dissenting opinion to the ICJ’s January 26 Order, however, “[w]hat distinguishes the crime of genocide from other grave violations of international human rights law (including those enumerated in Article II, paragraphs (a) to (d), of the Genocide Convention) is the existence of the ‘intent to destroy, in whole or in part…a group as such. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:55 am by Dan Farber
Required companies to report financial risks relating to climate change and how they are being managed. * * * A few closing thoughts:  California’s activity began just after President George W. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
[W]e hold the district court committed legal error by understating the woman's interest in anonymity, appearing to announce a general rule that fairness considerations invariably cut against allowing a plaintiff to be anonymous at trial unless the defendant is also anonymous, and failing to recognize the significance of its default judgment on liability…. [read post]