Search for: "STATE v HOLMES"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,545
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2010, 11:33 am
United States to Al-Haramain v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:32 pm
(emphasis added) KYEstates hasn’t read such a lyrical judicial summation of a key truth of T&E law since Judge Mark Holmes paid homage to Jane Austen in his whimsical, wonderful opening sentence in Hurford v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:32 pm
(emphasis added) KYEstates hasn’t read such a lyrical judicial summation of a key truth of T&E law since Judge Mark Holmes paid homage to Jane Austen in his whimsical, wonderful opening sentence in Hurford v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:24 am
In the end, (to paraphrase Justice Holmes’s infamous aphorism) 100 years of legal apartheid was enough! [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:01 pm
” Saxe, 240 F.3d at 204; see also United States v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 1:06 pm
” Gitlow, 268 U.S. at 672 (Holmes, J., dissenting); see also Meyer v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
Only Justice Holmes served on the Court at a greater age. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:13 pm
The book’s endorsement of Lewis’s many national-consensus pronouncements is most egregious in the instance of the Warren Court’s 1961 decision in Mapp v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:38 am
Doyle, Silver Blaze.Today's decision in Graham v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:12 am
Florida United States v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
That is more the function of state Supreme Court judges dealing with issues of state constitutional, statutory and common law, and even they are frequently constrained by federal constitutional law and federal preemption of state law. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:42 pm
Moreover, Judge Kendall decided that the use of Houlihan’s mark to identify it as the subject of the posters’ criticism was protected by Justice Holmes’ opinion in Prestonettes v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:59 pm
In the first case (Anderson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:40 pm
Jefferson deplored the state of newspapers in his time, but still lauded their necessity. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:04 pm
United States, PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
