Search for: "STATE v MYERS" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2008, 11:53 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Oxytrol (Oxybutynin) - US: Watson files patent infringement lawsuit against Barr over application to market generic Oxytrol; Barr challenges Oxytrol patent… [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:43 am by Sara Parrello
Indeed, both Upjohn and before Bristol-Myers Squibb and Others v Paranova (joined Cases C-427/93, 429/93 and 436/93) had indicated that “the requirement of artificial partitioning of the markets does not imply that the importer must demonstrate (emphasis added) that, by putting an identical product on the market in varying forms of packaging in different Member States, the trade mark proprietor deliberately sought to partition the markets between Member… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
  He focuses on Justice Stevens' and Scalia's dissents in the dismissal of the certified question in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am by Kara OBrien
At one point, the Deputy Minister tells the Agent that he will “keep him in the loop” about other bids and states that the last bidder might have “certain advantages. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm by Mark Zamora
See also Georgia State Bar Rules, DR 7-102(A)(3), (4) and (5); DR 7-106(C) (1); Rule 4-102(d) Standard 45 and O.C.G.A. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Divisional Court recently released a decision in Greenpeace Canada v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Taft’s most memorable opinion—probably the only one of Taft’s opinions that a typical law student could name—was Myers v. [read post]