Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2012, 3:09 pm by Steve Statsinger
The court accordingly remanded for a de novo sentencing.United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:30 am by Dennis Crouch
One of Holte’s first substantive patent decisions comes in Wanker v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, the high-profile union-fees case, and Dahda v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:15 am by Michael C. Dorf
I just don't think it's his preferred course of action.However, if the Democrats were to abolish the filibuster now and enact a law more or less codifying Roe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:42 am
The bill strangely proposes a preposterous process of certification under S.5. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
It ditched the lower court's strange interpretation of some language in Bates v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am by INFORRM
The blogger had written about an alleged affair between Strange and the campaign manager. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
He successfully argued New York Times v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by Kelly
Government (TorrentFreak) A new record: 9,729 P2P porn pushers sued at once (ArsTechnica) US Copyright – Decisions Thomas-Rasset damage award: The strange, unpredictable world of copyright damages (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (TorrentFreak) (Recording Industry vs People) (Recording Industry vs People) District Court E D California orders company to stop sending bogus DMCA notices to eBay: Design Furnishings, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What she demonstrates is that constitutional politics sometimes makes for strange bedfellows. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
  The Civil War, rather than the founding - rather than Marbury v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:41 am by Stephen E. Sachs
Yesterday in my conflict of laws class I taught South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by INFORRM
While Justice Thomas has cast some doubt on this form of analysis in his opinion in Reed v. [read post]