Search for: "Senat v. State" Results 1241 - 1260 of 11,749
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
In the case of Burston v Hanson [2022] FCA 1235 Bromwich J ordered the leader of the One Nation party, Paul Hanson, to pay $250,000 damages to former Senator Brian Burston after she falsely claim that he had sexually abused a female staffer  in his parliamentary office. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
  That’s why, in these midterm elections, it’s so critical to elect more Democratic senators to the United States Senate and more Democrats to keep control of the House of Representatives....And, folks, if we do that, here is the promise I make to you and the American people: The first bill that I will send to the Congress will be to codify Roe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 8:02 am by Richard Frank
Supreme Court is currently wrestling with that jurisdictional issue in a major CWA case–Sackett v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 9:53 pm by Florian Mueller
I'm also a bit worried that Congress may not adopt the Open App Markets Act as we're approaching the end of the legislative term, and there is a risk of some Senators and United States Representatives preferring not to hold the decisive vote shortly before the Epic v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm by William Appleton
Václav Bartuška, the Czech ambassador-at-large for Energy Security.. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
In August, The Trace presented a conspiracy about the amicus briefs filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by Anna Bower
Since then, she has subpoenaed testimony from an increasingly long list of the former president’s allies, including the former mayor of New York, Rudy Giliani; former White House Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows; and the Senator from South Carolina, Lindsey Graham. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 5:00 am by Nicolas P. Terry
These include so-called “take-home” lawsuits where the plaintiff is not the employee (typically barred by workers compensation laws), but a relative (a claim approved by a California appellate court in See’s Candies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 7:52 am by Eric Goldman
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am by Joseph Margulies
Habib, who is Australian, had been one of the four petitioners in Rasul v. [read post]