Search for: "Simon v. State"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,737
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
James: "The Law Firm commenced the instant action to recover legal fees in the amount of $58,900.36, arising from its representation of Simon during her underlying matrimonial action, entitled Simon v Simon (Sup Ct, NY County, Index No.: 303306/2001). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:17 am
This blog post was written with the assistance of Simon M. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am
Tuesday’s arguments in the GPS surveillance case United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:29 pm
"The Illinois Supreme Court analyzed this legal quandry in the case of Boub v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
This argument succeeded at first instance before Mr Justice Simon, who found Kookmin liable; however, that judgment was overturned by the Court of Appeal (Patten and Thorpe LJJ; Tuckey LJ dissenting). [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING THROUGH FARM SERVICE AGENCY, f/k/a FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Appellee. 1st District.Attorney Disqualification: BOFA SEEKS TO OUST AIG LAW FIRM FROM $10 BILLION CASE, AIG v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:33 am
On Thursday 10 November there's a "World Recognition of Distinguished General Counsel: Simon Evans, General Counsel of ArcelorMittal” session London's Plaisterer’s Hall. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
Borough of Pine Hill, 189 N.J. 497, 520 (2007) (quoting State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
, has expressed concern, stating: “Matters of such public importance and interest should be allowed to be discussed freely and with the highest degree of legal protection.” Next week in the courts On Monday 31 October 2011, the trial of El Naschie v MacMillan Publishers Ltd will begin before Sharp J (without a jury). [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
Indeed, we espy as much ethos as logos or pathos working on behalf of a Posner opinion.The recent opinion in Turek v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am
At ACSblog, Marco Simons discusses Kiobel v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
V. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
Tom states: If you think that a secret is something you tell one person at a time, you’re in the wrong job. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:38 am
This is the question presented in Perry v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am
And Simon Johnson and James Kwak, who write one of my favorite blogs, Baseline Scenario, also chimed in on the state of affairs with, “13 Bankers,” and yes, I reviewed it too. [read post]
