Search for: "State Bar of Texas Staff" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
The district court determined that the State was entitled to summary judgment because Helm fell within the "personal staff" exemption to Title VII’s definition of "employee" and thus did not qualify for the protections afforded by the statute. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
  At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4]  The federal government had its own DOMA.[5]  But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a… [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Nov. 24, 2015)(holding Anthem entitled under ERISA to remove claims to federal court and refusing employee benefit plan participants’ motion to remand to state court state claims arising from data breach); In re Anthem, Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 9:20 am by Lloyd Bemis
Lloyd is admitted to practice in the United States District Court - all Texas Districts and has argued before the U.S. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Critics say Trump and Attorney General William Barr seem to be working in concert to undermine public confidence in the election result, and the newly issued guidance could aid in that effort – allowing prosecutors to publicize cases of suspected fraud they previously would have been barred from discussing. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 7:47 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Also in a July 2019 media statement, Pearson stated that the breach may include dates of births and email addresses, when, in fact, it knew that such records were stolen, and falsely that Pearson had “strict protections” in place, when, in fact, it failed to patch the critical vulnerability for six months after it was notified. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:53 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
SRMC did not have a written authorization from  the patient to share this information with SRMC’s entire workforce and medical staff. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 1:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Eligible Long-Term Care Premiums & Periodic Payments For taxable years beginning in 2024, the limitations under § 213(d)(10), regarding eligible long-term care premiums includible in the term “medical care”, as adjusted for inflation, are as follows: Attained Age Before the Close of the Taxable YearLimitation on Premiums40 or less$470More than 40 but not more than 50$880More than 50 but not more than 60$1,760More than 60 but not more than 70$4,710More than 70$5,880For… [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 1:35 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Eligible Long-Term Care Premiums & Periodic Payments For taxable years beginning in 2024, the limitations under § 213(d)(10), regarding eligible long-term care premiums includible in the term “medical care”, as adjusted for inflation, are as follows: Attained Age Before the Close of the Taxable YearLimitation on Premiums40 or less$470More than 40 but not more than 50$880More than 50 but not more than 60$1,760More than 60 but not more than 70$4,710More than 70$5,880For… [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am by Robert B. Milligan and Daniel P. Hart
  ICANN recently reported its own data breach and indicated that the email credentials of some ICANN staff members were compromised. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:10 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Board Certified in Labor & Employment Law, Past Chair of the ABA RPTE Employee Benefit & Other Compensation Arrangements Group, Co-Chair and Past Chair of the ABA RPTE Welfare Plan Committee, Vice Chair of the ABA TIPS Employee Benefit Plans Committee, an ABA Joint Committee On Employee Benefits Council representative, Past Chair of the ABA Health Law Section Managed Care & Insurance Section, a Fellow in the American College of Employee Benefit Counsel, ABA, and… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:08 pm by Curran Tomko Tarski LLP
  Board Certified in Labor & Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, Chair of the American Bar Association RPTE Employee Benefits & Other Compensation Group, and a Council Member on the ABA Joint Committee on Employee Benefits, Ms. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:42 pm by Hunter Biederman
These changes will provide law enforcement and defense attorneys more access to prosecutors, as well as for more consistency in handling cases without the need for additional staff and connected growth in the budget. [read post]
” The state of Texas writes that college admissions “stand alone” as a departure from the court’s “long-held skepticism regarding racial discrimination” as seen in its rejection of diversity as a compelling interest in secondary schools and faculty hiring. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 10:26 pm by Just Security
Special thanks to  Just Security Student Staff Editors, Rick Da and Jeremy Venook, and to Matthew Fouracre and Nour Soubani. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:04 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Along with assisting their health plan clients with these activities, brokers, consultants, TPAs, and other plan vendors also should evaluate the potential implications of the reforms in the 02/06/20 Proposed Rule as well as any relevant state law reforms on the advice and services they provide to their clients, as well as their potential responsibilities and exposures in light of the evolving state health and PBM transparency rules. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:34 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
    When carrying out these activities, most covered entities and business associates also will want to take steps to monitor potential responsibilities and exposures under other federal and state laws like the privacy and data security requirements that often apply to personal financial information, trade secrets or other sensitive data under applicable federal and state laws and judicial precedent. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 12:46 pm by Amy Howe
United States, which bars members of the military for suing the federal government for injuries that “arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to” military service. [read post]