Search for: "State California v. Superior Court" Results 1241 - 1260 of 3,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Matthew Shultz
Finally, the court found that, while California has an interest in applying its own law to California transactions, it has little interest in applying its law to transactions in other states. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:41 pm
   In a clear allusion to the California Supreme Court's ongoing (and seemingly never ending) review of Brinker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:29 pm by Andrew Frisch
The court granted the plaintiff’s motion holding that the six-month limitations period was in fact unconscionable under California law. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
*  A court should next ask whether the chosen state’s law is “contrary to a fundamental policy of California” and whether California has a materially greater interest in resolution of the issue. [read post]
CGC16550128 (California Superior Court, County of San Francisco)—which included $250 million in punitive damages—was just the first in the nearly 8,000 Roundup-related cases currently pending against Monsanto, many of which are consolidated in multidistrict litigation in California federal court. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:40 am by Eugene Volokh
Georgia Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Tracie Cason's decision last week in Walters v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 9:58 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
That case involved 678 individual product liability claims joined together in a California state court based mass action. [read post]
In this case, the California District Court found persuasive the Oregon District Court’s reasoning in Reames v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm by Mark Murakami
  Finally, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in the Tuaua v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 12:35 pm
DePuy, BC456086, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County (Los Angeles). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:10 am by Jacqueline Ponder
The State of Indiana filed a protective order in March 2011 asking the Marion Superior Court to block IBM’s attempts to take the deposition of Governor Mitch Daniels in the IBM-Indiana litigation regarding IBM’s $1.37 billion contract to modernize the state’s welfare system. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 11:50 am
While the California Supreme Court has not yet addressed the issue, the district court found persuasive several cases cited by defense attorneys, particularly the recent California state appellate court opinion in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
Initially, the plaintiffs filed an action in the Pierce County Superior Court for the State of Washington (“Brown I”), alleging state wage law claims on behalf of themselves and a proposed class. [read post]