Search for: "State v. Baker"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 2,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2013, 11:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:28 am
" McGrath v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:36 am
The Supreme Court recognized such an argument in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case from 2018, where they ruled that a state administrative agency ruled against an anti-gay baker because the agency demonstrated hostility toward religious beliefs. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 4:05 am
In Klein v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:11 am
On Friday, the Harvard Clinic filed a petition for certiorari in Baker v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:28 am
” “The complaint, as augmented by the affidavit of Singh submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss, sufficiently stated a cause of action for legal malpractice (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88; Doe v Ascend Charter Schs., 181 AD3d 648, 649-650). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 5:21 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Willie Clark v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Letters before action were then sent and undertakings by the first and second defendants were then given stating they would comply with the shareholders' agreement for 60 days. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:08 pm
In 1972, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from the ruling of the Minnesota Supreme Court in Baker v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:11 am
Dishonest Texts Can Create All Sorts of Legal Problems In the second decision (Baker v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:37 pm
But as the dissent points out, far more relevant is the Supreme Court's summary dismissal of the appeal in Baker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:51 am
January 20, 2016) (collective and class action under FLSA and state law alleging that defendant bakery operator improperly classified bakers as independent contractors and failed to pay overtime). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard… [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
It follows then that just as a state could not forbid bakers from baking cakes to celebrate same-sex wedding ceremonies, a state cannot force a baker to bake a cake in order to celebrate one. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
Such a claim would trivialize free speech protection in the way that the Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:16 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:00 pm
The low point came in Dobbs v. [read post]
