Search for: "State v. Billings" Results 1241 - 1260 of 19,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act - Class II Gaming)United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Native American Rights Fund
  State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlPhillip v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:05 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Bill followed that win with another appellate-court victory this year before the 3d DCA in Estate of Maher v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Melissa Louis-Williams (Tribal Court Bar Membership) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html Rancheria v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
So I assume that when the Bill returns to the House later this month, everyone will be in favour, no? [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
Conduct, 45 AD3d 927, 929 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 701 [2008]; Matter of Ostad v New York State Dept. of Health, 40 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Corines v State Bd. for Professional Med. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:19 pm by Bill Raftery
Moreover, a related bill (SB 2170) to remove the role of the bar from the state’s merit selection process got amended to include an Article V Accountability and Efficiency Workgroup (Article V is the part of the FL Constitution dealing with the judiciary) with a report due January 2012. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 3:27 pm by NARF
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (Criminal Jurisdiction; Tribal Conviction; PL 280) United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
The first to enact an anti-“Big Tech,” anti-Section 230 law was Florida, with Senate Bill 7072. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:48 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Mills (Intra-Tribal Leadership Dispute, Casino Management)State of California v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
Forty other states plus the Multistate Tax Commission supported Supreme Court review of the Nevada v. [read post]