Search for: "State v. Brady" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2012, 7:41 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Naturally, prosecutors facing trials will be tempted to mobilize the leverage that extra years of incarceration provide to avoid the inspection stage altogether by forcing pleas.In  Missouri v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:40 am by Steve Hall
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
”  However, in its press release on the new case, the NFLPA clarified that this collusion claim was previously unknown to the players, is entirely new, and therefore could not have been asserted in the Brady v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:42 am by Steve Hall
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm by CPoplin
Back in January, Sebastian Brady and I wrote a piece on the history and legal issues surrounding the border enclaves divided between India and Bangladesh. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:27 am
Broom claimed that he did have good cause for not presenting the records in the state courts:   the Supreme Court’s 1994 decision in State ex rel Steckman v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
Attorneys with the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence represent Gary, Ind., in this case.Here is a link to the Supreme Court's Dec. 23, 2003 opinion in Gary v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Kaylo, No. 07-30024 Denial of a habeas corpus petition alleging that state prosecutors had committed Brady violations is reversed where the prosecution had withheld material impeachment evidence during defendant's manslaughter trial. [read post]
5 Oct 2024, 9:18 am by Amy Howe
And in this case, he stresses, the state court’s decision “relied directly” on federal law – specifically, the Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence,… [read post]