Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 1241 - 1260
of 13,580
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2021, 7:57 pm
by Dennis Crouch Amgen v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
Three California state courts enforced federal forum provisions for Delaware companies in Wong v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:49 am
Aulus Gellius, Attic Nights (John C. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
Art. 40 Brussels I Bis [10] See ECJ July, 13, 2006, C-4/03, Gat v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald &… [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Leslie C. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
"Preliminary" means that the ECJ answers the question, and then the national court resumes its proceedings and enters its judgment, as opposed to a traditional appeal from a final judgment.When I saw the question referred to the ECJ, I already noticed that it was very well written, and I wish the Dusseldorf Regional Court had done a similarly good job in that Nokia v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 7:03 am
The judge confirmed that the standard of review in this case was irrationality, as set out by Singh J (as he then was) in R(May) v Birmingham CC (2012) EWCA 1399 (Admin). [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 4:01 am
C. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:26 pm
The Cuban government announced, as is its habit now, through the show "Mesa Redonda", a set of potentially far ranging reforms of the non state sector and its regulation. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 12:48 pm
Fund v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 2:17 pm
This was recently illustrated in a recent Appellate Division decision, Goethals v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 2:16 pm
From Let Them Play MN v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
On Wednesday 10 February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of R (on the application of A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
The clause states: "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 8:10 am
R. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
A change in course does not end a case where a plaintiff seeks damages for past wrongs, but where, as in Trump v. [read post]
