Search for: "State v. CERTIFIED SERVICES, INC." Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
The Court also listed two cases for this Thursday’s Conference after extended holds:  Philip Morris USA Inc v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:58 am by Nabiha Syed
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:32 pm by Russ
“To prepare their 2006 Federal income tax return, petitioners hired Venture Tax Services, Inc. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
The contract must state the percentage of compensation for the public adjuster’s services; the type of claim, including an emergency claim, nonemergency claim, or supplemental claim; the signatures of the public adjuster and all named insureds; and the signature date. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:57 am by Kara OBrien
  Tenaris’s Asserted FCPA Violation and Subsequent Investigation According to the Statement of Facts in the Tenaris DPA, in 2006 and 2007, Tenaris’s sales personnel for the Caspian Sea region (which accounted for only 1% of its total global sales and services between 2003 and 2008) allegedly engaged in a bid-rigging scheme involving four contracts with OJSC O’ztashqineftgaz (“OAO”), a subsidiary of Uzbekistan’s state-owned oil and gas… [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
España Service, 117 D.P.R. 729, 745 (1986).Notwithstanding, it is clear that the judgment of the trier of fact is due deference, but is not absolute. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
Mountain States (Patently-O) Court of Appeal of Michigan – Malpractice: Failure to thoroughly advise in settlement negotiations: Viking Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 7:50 pm by Donald Pinto
NREIS (pdf) may not have fully answered the two questions the First Circuit certified, but the guidance the SJC did provide may make it difficult for out-of-state companies to continue selling "settlement services" in Massachusetts. [read post]
4 May 2011, 7:50 pm by Donald Pinto
NREIS (pdf) may not have fully answered the two questions the First Circuit certified, but the guidance the SJC did provide may make it difficult for out-of-state companies to continue selling "settlement services" in Massachusetts. [read post]