Search for: "State v. Downes" Results 1241 - 1260 of 36,249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2018, 8:09 pm by David Super
  Several states with Republican majorities in both chambers of their legislatures buried or voted down convention resolutions. [read post]
As previously reported on this blog the Supreme Court has handed down judgment in the case of North & Ors v Dumfries and Galloway Council (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 45. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in the case of Joseph v Spiller ([2010] UKSC 53), the first time it has considered a libel case since its inception. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:27 am by Ciaran Gill, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court recently handed down judgment in Bank of Cyprus UK Limited v Menelaou [2015] UKSC 66, providing valuable clarification concerning the areas of unjust enrichment and subrogation in particular. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by Erin Miller
In some instances, like in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:31 am
Related Issues: Free SpeechSection 230 of the Communications Decency ActRelated Cases: Internet Archive v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:29 am by Legal Support Service
In regards with Ms Mirga, Neuberger stated that the right under art 21.1 is qualified by the words “subject to limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and by the measures adopted to give them effect”. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:20 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 In the wake of the SCOTUS ruling in June striking down same-sex marriage bans and granting federal benefits to same-sex married couples, many couples are finding their way to court houses across the country.Most states that have what could be called "gay-friendly" legislatures, something that we would expect changes over time, have already passed laws specifically granting gay couples the right to marry in a dozen states. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:27 am by admin
In a rather shocking development, the United States Supreme Court voted 5-4 to strike down “the judicial precedent that established the legal supremacy of right over wrong more than two centuries ago. [read post]