Search for: "State v. Downs" Results 1241 - 1260 of 40,826
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) April 22, 2014 Tweet Tags: racial preferences, Sonia Sotomayor, Supreme CourtSchuette v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:05 pm by John C. Manoog III
” Perhaps never was this statement more true than in a recent case handed down by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by MARK GREAVES, MATRIX CHAMBERS
Williams v The Trustees of Swansea University Pension & Assurance Scheme and another [2018] UKSC 65 was handed down on 17 Dec 2018. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:09 am by CMS
This week, the UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union v Wightman and others. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 1:13 am by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
While Roberts was on appeal, the California Supreme Court handed down its decision in McGill v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:01 pm
Today the Tenth Circuit handed down a very interesting Fourth Amendment decision, United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm by Ilya Somin
There, social media firms urged the Court to strike down state laws requiring them to host speech the firms object to. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
By Judgment handed down on 29 November 2018 (R (on the Application of Jefferies and Others) v (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department (2) Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin)) Lord Justice Davis and Mr Justice Ouseley dismissed the Claimants claims for Judicial Review of the Government’s decision to not embark on ‘Part 2’ of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm by Luke A. Williams
The CCA handed down two opinions today dealing with legal sufficiency of evidence. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
[I'm with Keller on this one, why go into tearing down the defendant's arguments when you've already said the statute unambiguously applies to state jail felons and you've already held as much. [read post]