Search for: "State v. Little Bear" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
In the challenge by 26 states to Congress’s decision in the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid coverage — an expansion that the states claim will simply bust their budgets – the states are relying upon the so-called “coercion theory.”  This has to do with the conditions that Congress tells states they must meet in order to qualify for federal funds to help pay for a public program. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 Paragraph [0003] of the Patent states that the invention is directed to chronic pain disorders. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
Scott for the bearing it might have upon the strike of Mr. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 2:23 pm
 In all of these changes a remarkable thing occurs--the misery and desperation of individual migrants are utilized and directed by and toward ends that have little to do with their misery and actions (migration to escape danger or seek a better life) becomes the central animating feature of the instrumentalization of migration and its deployment against targeted populations and the States in which they inhabit. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
Holt of Little Rock, an assistant attorney general for Arkansas, will argue for the state in Jackson. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:16 am by Doug Cornelius
The Delaware court sets the standard of review using the the four-factor formula set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:55 am by Jon Hyman
In 1964 (and indeed until the 2000s), and in some states until the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]